Wellbeing
Publication Date
9-2021
Subjects
Best practice, Design, Disadvantaged, Drug education, Health education, Health promotion, Life education, Literature reviews, Program descriptions, Program evaluation, Well being, Emotional development, Interpersonal competence, Social values
Abstract
This rapid evaluation of core Life Education programs conducted by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) in June 2021 is an independent investigation that demonstrates the evidence base underpinning Life Education programs in primary schools Australia-wide. It presents a national snapshot by drawing upon existing Life Education-specific evaluation data, existing ACER student wellbeing data, and accepted best practice in the field of student health and wellbeing education. The project addressed the key evaluation questions: How are core Life Education programs underpinned by evidence-based best practice, and how are core Life Education programs impacting primary-aged student wellbeing outcomes that align to the health and physical education Australian and State Curriculums?
Recommended Citation
Dix, K., Ahmed, S. K., Carslake, T. & Sniedze-Gregory, S. (2021). Evidence of impact underpinning Life Education Programs. Report for Life Education Australia. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-643-7
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Copyright Statement
This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission may be granted for derivatives. Contact Life Education lea@lifeeducation.org.au
Place of Publication
Sydney, N.S.W.
Publisher
Life Education Australia
ISBN
978-1-74286-643-7
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-643-7
Comments
This project was commissioned and funded by Life Education Australia. The Australian Council for Educational Research wishes to thank Life Education and the state and territory offices for their support and cooperation throughout the independent rapid review. In particular, we would like to acknowledge Kellie Sloane (CEO) and Jane Lowe (Project Manager) for their guidance and feedback in this milestone project.